Contract health check

Eight questions. One clearer view of commercial risk.

Your answers remain in your browser and are not submitted or stored. The result is an initial indication, not legal advice.

Question 1 of 8

How clearly are the contract’s key obligations understood by the project team?Clearly documented and briefedUnderstood by key individuals onlyPartially understoodNo structured review or briefing

Are contractual notices issued consistently and within required timescales?Yes, with a controlled processUsually, but reliant on individualsSome are late or incompleteThere is no reliable notice process

How current and contract-compliant is the project programme?Current, accepted and regularly updatedCurrent with minor gapsUpdates or acceptance are delayedNo reliable contract programme

Are change and compensation events tracked from instruction to agreement?Yes, through one controlled registerMostly, with some unresolved gapsSeveral events lack status or evidenceThere is no complete change record

How strong are the project’s contemporaneous records?Consistent, accessible and linked to eventsGood in most areasVariable or difficult to retrieveMaterial evidence gaps exist

Does the reported commercial position reconcile with payment, change and programme data?Yes, through regular reconciliationBroadly, with small differencesMaterial items remain unreconciledThe position cannot be reconciled reliably

Are upstream obligations effectively reflected in supply-chain appointments?Yes, with controlled flow-downMostly, with known exceptionsSeveral gaps or timing mismatches existThe positions are materially misaligned

How early are emerging disputes escalated and assessed?Early, with defined governanceUsually before positions hardenOften after correspondence escalatesOnly once formal action is threatened

Your initial assessment

Request a confidential review ↗Call 0115 795 0220